2009-09-30

Another revolution coming in China

The Beijing government plans a massive investment in social services, particularly health care. For investors, this will have a major impact on how to make money in China.

Tens of millions of people aren't covered by any health insurance, and millions who had insurance have lost it as a result of the global economic crisis.

Too many people live in fear that they're only one illness away from poverty.

In January, the Beijing government announced a plan to spend $124 billion by 2011 to provide some form of health insurance to 90% of the population.

A radical and profitable change

Either way you look at it, spending more than $60 billion a year to improve health care in China has the potential to be revolutionary.

We are looking at the beginning of revolutionary change in the Chinese economy.

For investors, that revolution will totally change how to make money in China.

Let me explain what's so revolutionary about spending $124 billion over two years.

The goals of the plan seem modest enough. The government wants to extend some form of health insurance to 90% of the Chinese population. "Some form" is the key. Each person covered would get an annual subsidy worth about $17 beginning in 2010. Medicines would be covered by the insurance. Some of the money would go to improving health centers in rural areas, and efforts would be made to reform the operation of public hospitals.

Now, $17 a year per person doesn't seem like much, and indeed it's not in the developed economies of the world. It's a much bigger deal in rural China, which is much poorer than the urban areas.

In the first quarter of 2009, according to a nationwide government survey, the average household in rural China showed an annual income of $237 at official exchange rates. Rural households average 4.5 people (or at least they did in 1995, which is the most recent data I could find). In a household of four people, the new plan would provide an annual budget of $68 a year. That's a big percentage on a household income of $237.

Cash and apothecary

The effect, though, is even greater if you look at the way China's health care system works now. Everything requires a cash payment from the minute you walk through the door.

Think about living on a household income of $237 a year and knowing that a thing like an infected appendix could bankrupt you. And that without ready money -- $100 or so -- you can't get a diagnosis or tests.

Save or die

What would you do? If you live in China, you save like your life depends upon it. Because it does.

Do you really wonder why China's savings rate is something like 40%?

The government has known about this problem of social insecurity for years. It is a completely predictable result of breaking the iron rice bowl, the government-provided social services that formed the basis of Chinese society until the introduction of "it's all right to get rich" economics by Deng Xiaoping.

But the decision to devote tens of billions a year to improving health care and providing a minimal level of health insurance is a remarkable sign that the government actually intends to do something about social insecurity in China.

And the leaders in Beijing are also moving to put money into education and pensions.


Waiting to buy the revolution

What does that mean for those of us who constantly search for ways to invest in China?

Companies such as Ping An Insurance (PNGAY, news, msgs) or China Medical Technologies (CMED, news,msgs) that will be direct beneficiaries of more government spending on social services.

Chinese stocks are incredibly volatile, and lower prices will come to he or she who waits.

And you're not in any hurry. This revolution in China's economy is just getti started, and it has a long way to run.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/JubaksJournal/another-revolution-coming-in-china.aspx

2009-09-27

經濟新自由主義:剝削到底的世界樣板

隨著全球財經結構改變,古典的剝削現象無論在型態與規模上,也跟著出現了巨大的變化

其一,資本流動在全球更加暢通無阻,一個在各國赚取成長果實的全球資本利得階級形成,並日益壯大。

其二,公司財團在私有化及參與公共建設的名義下,將國家納為剝削對象,這是個公共資源私人化的過程,公司財團是透過掏空國家而間接的剝削國民

也正因此,當代法國思想家布赫迪厄指出,這樣的機制是一種“剝削到底的烏托邦”,造成的結果是貧富差距日益無限大,政府債務也跟著無限大

由於工程、交通、保險、醫院這些公共利益部門愈來愈公私不分,權責不明,整個社會依賴的內聚力也漸趨蕩然;再加上長期失業的固定化,以及工作機會不穩定,社會儘管日益不公平,但這種不公平只會造成人們為了自保而更加自私自利

英國前首相撒切爾夫人說:“沒有社會這樣的東西。”指的就是在這樣的狀態下,只有單獨而驚恐不安的個人,每個個人都已被馴服

以上這種新的剝削圖像,就是1970年代末期開始出現,80年代擴及歐,1990年代後散佈到各新興經濟體的所謂“經濟新自由主義”。

所謂“新自由主義”是一組意識形態,表面上將古典自由主義裡的“個人”概念神聖化與美化,但它說的“個人”,實質上只不過是“公司財團”的代號;另外則是政府的職能裡,除了軍隊和警察權外,它都一律加以醜化,認為政府必然無能。

在這兩大編造的前提下,它推演出一串說辭――公營事業必須民營化(即財團化)

政府的工程、醫療、機場道路、休憩文化設施,甚至包括監獄,都應委交民間辦理,認為這樣才會有效率。在這些說辭包裝下,資產階級遂取得了掏空國家的話語支配權

新自由主義的這組意識形態,在1980年代末進入各新興經濟體,由於符合當時的政治與經濟氣氛,很快的就有了“促進民間參與公共建設法”的制定。

民間參與公共建設成了政商勾串利益輸送的最佳快速道。

任何工程只要掛個私营化的帽子,政府就可撇掉責任而與財團上下其手。

私营化的政商勾串,選舉綁樁,對促進公共建設少,養出了一堆財團則真。

http://opinions.sinchew-i.com/node/11670

2009-09-25

身家

身家
李纯恩(香港)

每个阶层有每个阶层不同的消费模式。

一些人觉得贵得不可想象的东西,对另一些人来说,可能就叫做"基本生活"。

这也不一定要跟超级富豪去比,只要了解不同阶层就会有不同的开销。

其实,一个人只要保持收入的话,不管你是不是超级富豪,再怎么身家缩水,影响的也只是"身家",基本生活是不受影响的。

基本生活,要到真正用到“身家”的时候,才会有影响。

只要你的工作没有受到影响,一般来说,你不会无端端去动“身家”。

你的“身家”权当一个浮动数字看待,当赌王的身家浮升之后,你的也会浮升回去,这一天肯定会到来,只要你不要在这一天没来到的时候,去动“身家”的脑筋。

2009-09-24

Young, Fearless and Fed Up

Robert Tuchman: Fearless Entrepreneurs

Young, Fearless and Fed Up

Take the leap, follow your passion and pursue the new American Dream.

I had followed my passion and started my own business doing something I truly loved.

it’s essential that you are able to marry your work and what you love. This passion will ignite the minds of your potential clients and connections. Your business has to be a reflection of what you are already willing to pour countless hours into. Your passion and enthusiasm for your business has to connect to your why, be a part of your own experience, and is ultimately what will make you successful.

Unfortunately, many young people today don't realize the types of risks they can afford to take. If you don't take risks you’ll never accomplish most of your goals and you’ll never know if your dreams could have come true.

We’re socialized to believe that the path to success is to graduate from college, take an entry level position with an established company and work our way up the corporate ladder of the American dream. Our generation faces one small problem with this plan: that world does not exist anymore. It's a fantasy to expect anyone or any company to provide a path to riches.

If you’re young and hungry, why not go take a chance on launching yoru business? Most likely, you have limited responsibilities with no kids or mortgage payments and only a deep passion to obtain your dream; all keys for success.
Look at Mark Zuckerberg, the creator of Facebook. He started the site as a hobby out of his college dorm room and turned it into the global phenomenon we know it as today. He had an idea and a vision and took a huge risk. Now he's worth billions, all because he went with his gut and didn't worry about what others would think.

How about those three guys from YouTube? Steven Chen, Chad Hurley, and Jawed Karim were PayPal employees who started a little website in their free time for users to upload their own videos for everyone to see.

Don't get the wrong impression, this kind of success doesn't come easy; it involves a tremendous amount of hard work and a fire burning passion to keep you motivated on a daily basis. You have to be willing to take big risks, there are a people who talk about doing it but they just can't seem to take the leap. It really comes down to being ready for a better the quality of life.

If you decide to take the leap, you can’t expect everything to go according to plan; just know mistakes are inevitable. You have to keep pushing through, though; don’t let one mistake ruin your opportunity for success. Life is full of obstacles and hardships, you need to work through them--by doing this it will better you as a person.

Don't settle for the safe bet, push the limits and expand your horizons. Take a risk, what’s the worst that can happen? At least you can tell yourself, you went for it!



2009-09-23

4 Common myths about creating a passive, ongoing income

In an article by Kevin Bidwell on, he talks about the 4 myths of creating ongoing income and that we should dispel some of these myths surrounding the sales hype.

Myth One: Put up a Website and Sit Back and Collect the Checks.

Those of us who have run Internet businesses for a while can tell you: Making a good living on the Internet requires marketing, customer service and order fulfillment.

Either you have to do it yourself or you need to hire someone to do it. Either way, having a website and selling your own products is often far from the "laying around on the beach while collecting your checks" image.

Business Club | Malaysia Mini Lover | Online Clothing Store | eMag Asia Korean Site

Myth Two: M-L-M Income is Residual Income.

Almost always a part of the sales pitch in networking is "creating residual income." While that is *possible* with M-L-M, it is very difficult to maintain. Here's why...

M-L-M income is built on three basic factors: new purchases by retail customers, the recruiting of new *wholesale* customers and the ongoing purchases by both groups.

In order to have an ongoing "residual" income, you need to recruit, train and motivate a sufficient number of *leaders* who will then continue the process in growing numbers. This is rarely the case.

Instead, top leaders have found it is easier to build a large list of M-L-M "junkies" who they then take into one program after another. If you stopped joining new programs, your income would also dwindle within a few months.

Myth Three: Just Build Your Business and Hire People to Run It for You.

This does work, but it is often more of a nightmare than a dream.
At various times I have had anywhere from 0 to 15 employees. I have had many friends and clients with much numbers up to 1,000 employees. We all have the same opinion: Unless you have enough employees and profits to hire top quality managers, employees are a constant headache.

If you DO build a big enough, profitable enough, business and if you have the right personality, then building your business and hiring people to run it is a great idea.

Myth Four: Developing A Passive Income is Easy.

I don't want you to fall for this one, either.

Developing a passive income will take some perseverance.

The steps to getting it done are not difficult, but it requires one thing many people will not put in -- consistency.

If a person does the right things, day after day, they will create an ongoing, growing income. If they try today, then one day next week, then one day a month later, they are unlikely to ever get there.

If you can dispel of these myths and avoid trusting in them, get ready to put in real effort and work towards a strong passive and residual income... and keep it up, in no time at all, you will be able to gain finan-cial independence and choose to live your life the way you want to.


2009-09-18

How to retire on $12,000 a year

Now let's examine how economies of shared living ca n benefit a retiree.

Imagine a single retiree living in a 55-and-over trailer park. She has a monthly net Social Security benefit of $1,100. From that she has to pay $400 for land rent and $300 for the loan payment on the manufactured home. That leaves only $400 a month for food, clothing, transportation and everything else.

It's not a pretty picture.

The solution is social.

It is called sharing, having enough social skills to multiply your effective income to a level far greater than it could be made with ordinary cash.

The productive social alternative is sharing. Economists call it "economies of shared living." Most of us think about it in regard to marriage.

Though two people can't live for the price of one, the cost of living doesn't double when you get married. Divorce, on the other hand, involves returning to the dis-economies of nonshared living.

That's why it's common for one ex-spouse, or both, to have a lower standard of living after divorce.


This is not a utopian commune or a spiritual community. It's just four retirees figuring out how to get along in a trailer park.

Sharing offers a major "return" for being creative and flexible.

Cooperation is a wonderful but generally overlooked substitute for money.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/RetirementandWills/CreateaPlan/RetireOnTwelveThousandDollarsAYear.aspx

2009-09-17

What underwater borrowers have in common

Risky mortgages:

Some 77% of option-ARM borrowers and 50% of subprime mortgage borrowers were estimated to be underwater as of the first quarter of 2009, according to the Deutsche Bank report.

With option-ARMs, borrowers could make minimum monthly payments that didn't even cover the loan's interest. As the market declined, these balances grew. With subprime mortgages, borrowers often had poor credit scores and little documentation of their financial situation. In both cases, borrowers often ended up with a large mortgage relative to the house's price.

Date of purchase:

Individuals who bought their homes between 2003 and 2008 are at risk of being underwater because they bought while prices were rising, Zandi says. The risk is greatest for those who bought in 2005 and 2006, as the market approached its peak.

Excessive borrowing:

Many individuals borrowed against their homes during the bubble by taking out second mortgages or tapping into home equity lines of credit or home equity loans. This borrowing left their homes with less equity to weather the drop in home values.

Home's location:

The areas that have been hit the hardest by plunging home values include the "sand states" of Arizona, California, Florida and Nevada because they brought the most speculation, easy credit and overbuilding during the bubble, Zandi says. Also hurt: the states where unemployment is especially high and manufacturing jobs have been eliminated like Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, Zandi says.


2009-09-15

Children maketh the parents

More and more adults are choosing not to have children. This will reshape human society, according to social demographers n the UK.

I guess they mean "reshape" as in "wipe out".But before that happens, something scarier will happen. There will be a pandemic of meltdowns.

You see, having totally helpless dependants (children,grandzparents,pets and some husbands) cause an adult's capacity to tolerate problems to expand until it is roughly the size of Australia or Donald Trump's ego, whichever is larger.

Parents become immune to disaster. Children alternate between ruining our lives and giving them meaning, sometimes simultaneously.

Tonight, one of the kids will probably microwave my phone. Tomorrow, the dog will eat my wallet. The next day, Granny will burn the house down. Am I bothered ?

No, it's all part of the rich tapestry of events which make up that joyful thing called family life. I can survive anything. Even getting the wrong lunch order.

I am invicible. I am a parent.

Nury Vittachi, The Sun (Good Vibes), September 14, 2009

2009-09-14

Lehman's Collapse - an insider's view

The 158-year-old Lehman filed for bankruptcy protection on Sept 15 2008, in the largest US bankruptcy filing in history, leaving the future of 25,000 staff in jeopardy and sending a financial tsunami across the globe that continues to reverberate today.

Lehman was heavily overleveraged at the top of the market in 2007 - its net tangible equity was US$17 billion (RM59.5 billion) but its total investment was US$750 billion (RM 2.62 trillion) - a good chunk of it in mortgage-backed securities that turned "toxic".

"Inside Lehman, some really weird things were going on ... the 31st floor was one of those mysterious places on Wall Street because we had incredibly talented risk-takers that were politically outmanoeuvred and squashed like grapes," said a fuming McDonald (once bond trader, now MD of Pangea Capital Management).

"They didn't just rule with an iron fist, they wore brass knuckles."

McDonald said the lessons from Lehman's collapse were important - "not just to warn of such disasters in the future but ultimately to provide a beacon to help us serve Main Street better"

- AFP

The Sun (Business), September 14, 2009

2009-09-13

资产证劵化的实质

华尔街有句名言:如果有未来的现金流,就把它做成证劵。其实,金融创新的本质就是,只要能够透支的,都可以在今天就变现

当今世界的各种金融创新都兴起于 20 世纪 70 年代布雷顿体系这一“准金本位”被废除之后。

在金本位体制之下,金融业的核心资产是黄金,所有流通中的货币必须经受“纸币兑换黄金”这一经济铁律的考验。银行系统不能,也不敢放手生产“别人的债务”来创造债务货币,以免遭到人民的挤兑

债务在黄金的严密监管之下保持着谦卑的规模。

在金本位的制约之下,世界主要国家的通货膨胀几乎可以忽略不计,长期财政赤字和贸易赤字绝无藏身之处,外汇风险几近于零。

而在美元与黄金脱钩之后仅仅 30 多年里,美元的购买力已跌去 90% 以上。

货币购买力贬值,或者说通货膨胀究竟对社会中的哪些人最有利呢?谁又是这场巨大的社会财富博弈的最大失败者呢?

还是凯恩斯说得明白:“通过连续的通货膨胀,政府可以秘密地、不为人知地剥夺人民的财富,在使多数人贫穷的过程中,却使少数人暴富。”。。。

奥地利学派曾形象地将通货膨胀的根源之一的银行部分储备金制度比喻成罪犯在“偷印假钱”。在部分储备金制度之下,将必然产生永久性的通货膨胀问题。

通货膨胀将产生两大重要后果,一是货币购买力下降,二是财富重新分配




2009-09-12

钱印多了东西自然会涨价

通货膨胀将产生两大重要后果,一是货币购买力下降,二是财富重新分配。

而通货膨胀造成的财富重新分配不是那么直观的。

形象地说,银行在部分储备金之下“无中生有”地创造支票货币就相当于在印假钞票。

离假钞票越近的人就越占便宜,越远越晚的就越倒霉。

在现代银行制度下,房地产业离银行比较近,因此它就占了不小的便宜。而靠养老金生活和老老实实储蓄的人就是最大的输家。

因此,通货膨胀的过程就是社会财富发生转移的过程。在这个过程中,那些远离银行系统的家庭的财富遭到了损失。

怎么说呢?

当买房人在银行签订借款合同时,银行将这个“债务借条”作为资产放在了它的资产负债表的资产项下,同时创造出同等数量的负债(注意:银行的这个负债在经济意义上等同于货币)。

换句话说,银行在发放债务的同时,创造了货币,由于部分储备金制度允许银行系统创造出原本部存在的钱,所以这笔几十万的刚刚被银行“无中生有地创造出来”的新钱,立刻被划到了房地产公司的帐上。

房地产公司就是第一个拿到“假钱”的人,这就是为什么房地产公司财富累积速度惊人的原因。

当房地产公司开始花这笔“假钱”时,全社会的整体物价上涨压力会在“假钱”换手过程中呈波浪式扩散。

由于这种传导机制极为复杂,社会商品的供求变化又增加了多维变量空间,社会的货币心理反应还存在着相当程度的滞后效应,这些因素叠加在一起,就难怪凯恩斯会认为通货膨胀的真正源头“一百万人之中也不见得能有一人发现”。

从本质上看,银行系统由于部分储备金的放大作用,能以数倍的能力放大债务货币发行量。

这种货币增发从根本上说必然大大超越实际经济增长的速度,这就是流动性过剩的真正根源。

这种银行货币的本质是银行出具的“收据”。在金本位时,这个“收据”对应着银行的黄金资产,而在纯粹的债务货币体系中,它只是对应着另外某人欠银行的等值债务

MBS (Mortgage Backed Securities) 从根本上说大大提高了银行系统发行支票货币的效率,同时也就必然造就严重的货币供应过剩问题,这些过剩的货币如果不是涌进拥挤不堪的股市,就会继续吹大房地产的价格泡沫,更糟的是“泄漏”到物质生产和商品消费的领域中,造成怨声载道的物价上涨。

相关 Related:

2009-09-11

4 signs your home value could drop

Even if you have a stable job and can pay your mortgage, your house might not be safe from a dip 'underwater.' Look around to see whether your house is at risk.

With so many borrowers "underwater" -- or owing more on their mortgages than their homes are worth -- the risk is high that they'll default and their homes will go into foreclosure.

Negative equity 负资产 is the product of several factors. The most significant weight is the broad and persistent decline in home values.

The continued decline of U.S. home prices will contribute to rapidly rising rates of negative equity. The most obvious implication is for mortgage defaults.

Current homeowners, or those shopping for a home and who are concerned that they'll end up underwater, should consider how long they expect to live in their homes.

Being underwater doesn't affect homeowners unless they plan to sell.

Whether you're at risk for falling behind may have more to do with the economy and your neighborhood than your job, your credit or your income. Here are four warning signs that you're heading underwater.

1. Foreclosures in your neighborhood

The quickest way to end up underwater is to live in a neighborhood that's plagued by foreclosures.

As homes go into foreclosure, they create a domino effect, lowering home values throughout a neighborhood in a cascade beyond homeowners' control.

2. Homes lingering on the market

When "For Sale" signs linger in a neighborhood for three or more months, that may mean buyers and sellers can't agree on a price. In that environment, homes are unlikely to sell unless the sellers lower their asking prices.

The time on the market is always a good barometer of demand for homes and for the price homes are transacting at.

The longer it appears that neighbors are taking to sell their home the more likely it is they're not getting the price they want and that prices are falling.

Compare the time it took for homes to sell in your neighborhood three years ago versus today; if it's taking weeks or months longer to sell, the prices homes can fetch are dropping.

3. Increasing unemployment

In most cases, the cities where homes have lost the most value during the past year also possess the highest unemployment rates.

4. Homes in disrepair

Dented siding, peeling paint and broken porches could be signs that neighbors are having trouble making ends meet and can no longer pay to take care of their homes, Or they may have gotten an appraisal and discovered their homes have dropped in value and are no longer worth the cost of repairs.

As the condition of homes in your neighborhood worsens, home values almost inevitably drop.

The mere fact that they're not investing in their homes will affect you too.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/HomebuyingGuide/4-signs-your-home-value-could-drop.aspx

2009-09-10

债务美元是怎样“练成”的 (I)

美元不能够兑换财政部的黄金或其他任何资产。关于支撑“美联储劵”的资产问题没有实际意义,它只有记账方面的需要 。。。 银行在借款人承诺还钱时产生出货币。银行是通过将这些私人和商业债务“货币化”来创造金钱的。~美联储纽约银行

在美国,无论是纸币还是银行存款,都不像商品一样具有内在价值,美元仅仅是一张纸,银行存款也只是记账簿中的若干数字。硬币虽然拥有一定的内在价值,但通常远低于它们的面值。~美联储芝加哥银行

那究竟是什么使得这些支票、纸币、硬币等工具在偿还债务和其他货币时,能够被人们按照它们的面值来接受呢?主要是人们的信心

人们相信在它们愿意的情况下,他们随时可以用这些货币换成其他的金融资产以及真实的产品与服务。

这其中的部分原因是政府用法律规定,这些“法币”必须被接受。

也就是说,债务的“货币化”创造了美元,而美元的票面价值必须由外力来强制。

在债务货币之下,美国将永远无法偿还国债、公司和私人债务,因为还清债务之日,也正是美元消失之时。

美国的总债务非但不会减少,随着债务利息利滚利的雪球效应和经济自然增长的货币需求,美国的债务总量将会持续上升,而且速度越来越快. (The Unfair Advantage)

那么债务究竟是如何变成美元的呢?

要搞清楚“债转钱”的细节,我们必须拿着放大镜来仔细观察美国的货币运作机制。

2009-09-09

夫为不争,天下莫能与之争

最近一段时间里,国际石油价格暴涨,伦敦-华尔街轴心众口一辞,都说是中国经济发展惹的祸,无非是要挑起世人对中国的不满,掩盖石油暴涨是为了刺激美元需求这个事实。这与1973 年他们策划让石油涨价 400% 从而刺激美元需求,同时将油价暴涨的责任嫁祸于中东国家的石油禁运如出一辙。

在中国人心目中,从来不乏对真实财富的直觉。人们称和钱有关的活动为“金”融,储放财富的所在叫“银”行,货真价实的东西为“真金白银”。

当世界人民再度认识到债务货币的本质只不过就是一张欠条+许诺,所谓美元财富只是“一个被超级夸大的白条”和“对财富的无限许诺”而已,这些债务白条从来就是永远贬值的,而贬值的快慢取决于印刷它们的人的贪婪程度。

完全不懂金融的普罗大众,最终将会用他们的直觉和常识去选择存放他们辛勤汗水所创造的财富的“诺亚方舟”-黄金和白银。

2009-09-08

美元泡沫经济的死穴

倔强而持续上涨的黄金价格将会无情地推高美国长期债务利率。

由于国际银行家们向金融市场兜售了数十万亿美元的“利率保险”合同,保证长期利率不会上涨,一旦长期债务利率出现被金价逼着走高的局面,国际银行家们将会被暴露在他们自身的贪婪所营造的极度风险之中。

率先崩盘的金融衍生市场将产生前所未有的流动性恐慌,当惊恐万状的世界投资者一起试图将手中的各种“保险合同”抛售变现时,所有这些衍生品的生长基地:货币、债劵、商品、石油、股票将同时遭到“电击”,国际金融市场将爆发更大规模的流动性恐慌。

为了拯救已不可药救的金融市场废墟,美联储势必如黄河决堤一般地增发美元来“抗洪救灾”,当数十万亿增发的美元如海啸一般冲向世界经济体系时,世界经济将陷入一片混乱。

国际银行家蓄谋废除黄金货币之后仅仅30多年,美国就已经透支了世界 80% 的储蓄 。

http://howtze.blogspot.com/2009/07/unfair-advantage.html



到今天,美国必须每天继续从世界各国人民的身上“吸血”20亿美元的储蓄才能使美国这部“经济永动机”继续运转,美国的债务和利息赠加的速度早已远远超越了世界经济的增长能力。

当所有国家真金白银的“过剩储蓄”都被抽光之日,也就是世界金融崩溃之时。

这一天的到来,其实已不是会不会得问题,而是何时以何种方式发生的问题。

貌似庞然大物的美元泡沫体系,其致命的死穴就在信心二字,而黄金则是点中这一命门的“一阳指”。

2009-09-07

定价权

一切霸权的力量泉源和最终形式都体现于定价权,通过控制价格的过程来实现有利于己而不利于人的财富分配方式。

Example:
--------------------------------------------------
人们经常困惑于中国在国际市场上为何缺少定价权。

Wal-mart 可以将中国企业产品的利润压榨到令人心碎的程度,经济学家解释说因为它是最大的消费者,而且代表着美国这个最大的消费市场,消费者拥有着定价权。也有人解释说 Wal-mart 掌握着美国市场销售渠道,渠道权决定了定价权。

那么铁矿呢?石油呢?药品呢?客机呢?视窗软件呢?中国几乎是世界最大的市场之一,也完全掌握着中国市场的销售渠道,作为最大的消费者,怎么别人说涨就涨,说多少中国就必须老老实实地掏腰包呢?

实际上,中国缺少定价权的关键问题是没有金融的战略控制权!
--------------------------------------------------

中国的经济发展在很长的历史阶段都是依赖外国资金,没有对外开放引进外资的政策,就不会有中国今天的经济发展。

但是外资可以选择中国,也同样可以选择印度,外资可以选择进入,也同样可以选择撤走。

控制着资金流动权的一方才是真正的定价权的拥有者!

世界上的企业无论是100强还是500强,也无论是什么汽车工业的霸主,还是电脑业的巨擎,所有的企业必须进行融资。

金钱对于企业来说就像空气和水一样,须臾不可或缺。

金融行业对于全社会的各行各业而言,是绝对的主人。

谁控制着金钱的流动,谁就可以决定任何一个企业的兴衰存亡!

定价权的搏斗恰似帝位争夺一般剧烈,充满权谋和狡诈,价格现有在平等自由合理的市场运作过程中自然产生,拥有优势的一方从来就是以无所不用其极的手段来确保自己的利益,这和战争没有任何的本质区别。

人们比较容易理解的是为什么有人坐在老板的位置上发号施令,而多数人只能服从,因为一切都有切肤之感。

但老板的老板通过控制老板来间接控制众人,就不是那么明了和直观了,顺着这个权力链条越往上,人数就越少。

定价权的取得也是如此,控制着一种商品的价格从来就是自上而下的行为。

就黄金而言,谁控制了世界上最大的黄金交易商,谁就控制了黄金的价格。

所谓控制,就是交易商们为了利益或迫于威胁,主动或被动地接受权力上层的安排。

在一个商品社会里,没有人会对金钱具有“免疫力”。

货币是一种商品,而它不同于其他一切商品之处就在于,它是一种社会中每一个行业、每一个机构、每一个人都需要的商品,对货币发行的控制是所有垄断中的最高形式!


关键:中国的货币必须成为世界储备货币。从根本上讲,只有推动黄金白银的重新货币化,才能给世界各国创造一个自由、公平与和谐的金融生态环境。



2009-09-06

货币:经济世界的度量衡

货币是整个经济领域最基本、最核心的度量衡,货币的作用类似于物理世界中的千克、米、秒等最重要的尺度,一个每天都在剧烈动荡的货币体系,就如同千克、米、秒的定义时时刻刻都不停地变化一样荒谬而危险 (current forex system)

当今世界经济的根本问题之一,就在于没有一个稳定而合理的货币度量衡标准,从而导致政府无法准确测算经济活动的规模,公司难以正确地判断长期投资的合理性,人民对财富的任何长远规划丧失了安全的参照系。

货币对经济的作用在银行家任意和武断的操控下,已经严重扭曲了市场资源的合理分配。

经济学家只“关心”消费物价的通货膨胀水平,可是高得吓人的资产通货膨胀现象却没有人注意。

这样的货币制度是对储蓄者的残酷惩罚,这就是为什么尽管股票和房地产市场非常危险,但不投资将更加危险。

当人们买房时,向银行申请的贷款只是一张欠条,银行的账户上本没有这样多的钱,但在债务产生的同时,却无中生有地“创造出了”钱,这张欠条立刻被银行系统“货币化”了,于是货币供应将立刻增加几十万的流通量,这些增发的货币实时地推高了全社会的平均物价水平,尤其是在资产领域。

所以在没有房地产贷款时,房价不可能有如此高的水平。银行声称是为了帮助人民负担得起住房,但结果正好相反

银行房地产贷款相当于一下子透支了人民未来30年的收入,将“未来”30年的钱拿到今天一起发放成货币,如此海量的货币暴增,房价、股市、债市岂有不暴涨的道理?

当透支了人民未来30年的财富累积之后,房价已经高到普通人无法企及的程度。

为了“帮助”人民能够负担更多的债务来支撑更高的房价,银行家们正在英国和美国试点“终身房产债务”的“伟大创新”,英国将推出长达50年的房贷,美国加州准备试点45年的按揭;

如果试点获得成功,更大规模的债务货币增发即将决口而出,房地产将迎来一个更加“灿烂的春天”(check Malaysia's lately no installment for 1st 12 month occupancy and other "very attractive" financing packages),向银行贷款的人,将终身被债务的锁链紧紧束缚,没有购买房子的人下场则更为不妙,最终他们将贫穷到连银行的债务锁链都不屑去光顾的程度。

如果人民50年的债务美餐还不能喂饱银行家的胃口呢?只怕终有一天,“父债子还”、“爷债孙还”的“跨世代按揭贷款”也会被创造出来!

Related

2009-09-05

Global Environment Facility 世界环保银行:要圈地球 30% 的陆地

1987 年 9 月,世界野生环境保护委员会 (World Wilderness Congress) 第四次大会召开。

参加这次会议的代表们惊讶地发现,一份名为《丹佛宣言》的文件已经为他们准备好了。

---------------------------------------------------------
《丹佛宣言》:因为新的资金必须被筹集起来以扩大环境保护的活动范围,我们应该创造出一种新的银行模式,以便将对环境管理的国际援助与受援助的资源管理的需求加以整合。
---------------------------------------------------------

与以前类似会议不同的是,一大批国际银行家出席了这次会议。

这些超级大忙人居然在一个环保会议上盘恒了整整六天,向大会介绍和推销世界环保银行的金融方案。

请注意,截至 1987 年,发展中国家的全部债务高达 1.3 万亿美元。

世界环保银行的核心概念就是“以债务替换自然资源”(Debt for Nature Swap)。

国际银行家们计划将发展中国家的1.3 万亿美元的债务进行再贷款,将债务转到世界环保银行帐上,债务国用频临生态危机的土地做抵押,从世界环保银行那里得到债务延长和新软贷款 (Soft Currency Loan)。

被国际银行家圈出的发展中国家的“生态土地”遍布拉丁美洲、非洲和亚洲,总面积多达5000万平方公里,相当于5个中国的面积,占地球面积的 30% !

70 年代发展中国家向国际货币基金组织和国际以行家的贷款绝大多数没有抵押品,仅以国家信用为凭证,当债务危机爆发后,国际银行家们不太容易进行破产清偿。

当这些债务转到世界环保银行头上后,国际银行家们账目上原本很难看的呆账一下变成了优质资产。

由于世界环保银行拥有着土地作为抵押,一旦发展中国家无法清偿债务,这些被抵押的大面积土地在法律上就属于世界环保银行了,而控制着世界环保银行的国际银行家们就顺利成章地成为大片肥沃土地的实际拥有者。

世界环保银行的名称比较扎眼,最终以全球环境基金(Global Environment Facility)的名义于 1991 年成立,由世界银行负责管理,而美国财政部是世界银行最大的股东。

国际银行家们的长远规划目前正在遂步得以实施。

--------------------------------------------
治国与治家其实是同样的道理,高负债必然导致经济健康状态的脆弱,在外界金融环境完全不可控的情况下,得以生存只能凭侥幸。
--------------------------------------------

Related:

来自铁山的报告 Report from Iron Mountain

法國今年財赤可能創新高

2009-09-04

来自铁山的报告 Report from Iron Mountain

只有在战争时期,或者是在战争的威胁之下,人民才最有可能服从政府而没有怨言。

对敌人的仇恨和被征服与劫掠的恐惧,使人民更能够承受过重的税负和牺牲。战争又是人民强烈情绪的催化剂,在爱国、忠诚和胜利的精神状态下,人民可以无条件地服从,任何反对意见都会被认为是背叛行为。

相反,在和平情况下,人民会本能地反对高税收政策,讨厌政府过多干预私人生活。

战争系统不仅是一个国家作为独立政治系统存在的必要因素,对于政治稳定也是必不可少的。

没有战争,政府统治人民的“合法性”就会出现问题。战争的可能性提供了一个政府能够拥有权利的基础。

历史上不胜枚举的例子表明,失去战争威胁的政权,最终导致了权力瓦解(苏联,东欧),这种破坏作用来源于个人利益膨胀,对社会不公的怨恨,以及其他解体因素。

战争的可能成为保持社会组织结构的政治稳定因素。它保持了社会阶层分明,保证了人民对政府的服从(美国)。

传统的战争方式也有其历史的局限性,在这种状态之下,世界政府的大业将难以实现,特别是在核战时代,战争爆发变成了一种难以预测和风险极大的问题。

替代战争的新方案必须同时具备三大条件:

1。在经济上必须是“浪费”的,最少需要消耗每年 GDP的10%;

2。必须是一种和战争危险类似的、大规模的、可信的重大威胁;

3。必须提供人民强迫性服务于政府的合乎逻辑的理由。

专家们先想到“向贫困宣战”。贫困问题虽然够庞大,但是不具备足够的恐惧感,所以很快就被放弃了。另一个选择是外星人入侵,虽然这足够恐怖,但在 60 年代还缺乏可信度,于是又被放弃了。

最后大家想到了“环境污染”,它在相当程度上是一个事实,具备可信度,在对环境污染的宣传上下工夫,足以达到核战争后世界末日的恐怖程度;不断地污染环境的确是在经济上非常“浪费”的;人民忍受高税收和降低生活质量,接受政府干预私人生活,为的是“拯救地球母亲”,非常符合逻辑!

经过科学地估算,环境污染问题要达到在世界范围内引起强烈危机的时间大约为一代半左右,即 20~30年。

报告的发表时间是 1967 年。

-----------------------------------------------
铁山:靠近纽约州的哈德逊城,这里有当年冷战期间为防御苏联核打击而修建的巨大的地下设施,几百家美国最大公司的总部都在此处设有临时办公地点。如果核战争爆发,这里将成为美国最重要的商业运作中心,以确保核战争之后,美国商业体系仍然能够生存下来。平时,这里是这些公司储存机密文件档案的地方。
-----------------------------------------------

2009-09-03

剪羊毛

“剪羊毛”是银行家圈子里的一个专用术语,意思是利用经济繁荣和衰退的过程所创造的机会,以正常价格的几分之一拥有他人的财产。

当银行家控制了美国的货币发行大权,经济的繁荣和衰退变成可以精确控制的过程,此时的“剪羊毛”行为对银行家来说,就像从靠打猎为生的游牧阶段进化到了科饲养的稳产高产阶段。(1907 年银行危机)

为了向欧洲协约国提供贷款,银行家们在 1917 和 1918 两年中进行了四次大规模债劵募集,称为“自由债劵”(Liberty Bond),债劵利息从 3.5% 到 4.5% 不等。这些债劵发行的一个重要目的就是吸收美联储已经严重超量发行的货币和信用。

Federal Farm Loan Board - 农民们可能永远也不会知道他们掉进了一个精心设计的陷阱。

1929 年泡沫破裂:又一次“剪羊毛”行动

美联储从 1929 年到 1933 年紧缩货币流通量达 1/3,注定会造成大衰退。~米尔顿 弗里德曼

银行从纽约美联储银行可借到利息 5% 左右的款子,再转手以 12% 的利息贷给证劵商,吃足 7% 的利差,天下竟有如此美事!

这时候,纽约股市想不暴涨都不可能了。

1929 年 8 月 9 日,美联储将利息提高到 6%,紧接着美联储纽约银行将证劵交易商的利率由 5% 提高到 20%,投机商们顷刻陷入资金陷阱,除了不顾一切地逃出股市别无出路。

股票市场局面急转直下,犹如江河决堤一半,卖单在 10 月和 11 月横扫整个股票市场,1600 亿美元的财富立时灰飞烟灭。

1600 亿美元是个什么概念呢?接近美国在第二次世界大战中生产的数量庞大的全部物资的总和。


2009-09-01

The five stages of a bubble popping

In the 400-year history of stock markets "there has been a long succession of financial bubbles," Ferguson says. "Time and again, asset prices have soared to unsustainable heights only to crash downward again."

It's an all-too-familiar cycle, in fact, so familiar is this pattern -- as described by the economic historian Charles Kindleberger -- that it is possible to distill it into five stages:

1.
Displacement: "Some change in economic circumstances creates new and profitable opportunities." Last year's historic bailout, election, new ideology.

2.
Euphoria or overtrading: "A feedback process sets in whereby expectation of rising profits leads to rapid growth in asset prices." Goldman is proof.

3.
Mania and bubble: Prospects of "easy capital gains attract first-time investors and swindlers eager to mulct them of their money." More bubbles: 2010-2011.

4.
Distress: "Insiders discern that profits cannot possibly justify the now exorbitant price of the assets and begin to take profits." Wall Street replays 2007-2008.

5.
Revulsion or discredit: "Asset prices fall, the outsiders stampede for the exits, causing the bubble to burst." Yes, 2008's brutal meltdown repeats in 2012.


The bull, a bubble and another meltdown are virtually certain and accelerating faster than earlier cycles, coming by 2012. How to profit? Ride it up for a couple years, then pray you'll have enough brain left to bail out in time before the crash (most don't) because at that point the euphoria is blinding, like a cocaine addiction.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Extra/New-bull-new-bubble-new-meltdown.aspx